Conclusion
Emphasis on the multifaceted nature of resilience, incorporating economic, social, cultural, political, and natural dimensions recognises the interconnectedness of social capital, cultural values, and economic performance in shaping resilience outcomes to drive its enormous benefits in building household and livelihood amidst climate challenges. Minimum levels of human and social capital are necessary to effectively make use of natural, physical, and financial capital. The social domain is crucial for resilience because it mediates the relationship between economic, cultural and environmental components of a community. Social aspects of resilience are weakly developed, especially with regards to empowerments that include notions of collective community agency which are important to resilience. The structural form of social capital enters directly into all the determinants of the economic performance of agriculture. This form of capital is concerned with facilitating collective action and information sharing that would lower transaction costs and mitigate risks. Intangible cultural capital should affect economic performance only indirectly, through its effects on structural social capital, by predisposing individuals to cooperation and collective decisions making. The Assets Capabilities approaches posit that wellbeing is described in terms of assets, community support networks, and capabilities adapted to rural life. There is complementarity between different forms of capital and the essential role of this complementarity in sustaining tribal agriculture and social ties. Self-Help Groups (SHGs) enable households to withstand shocks as they operate well under large covariate shocks, providing counter-cyclical credit access during shocks. Credit access and peer networks contribute to increased food security and migration as risk management strategies. Supply-based programs are more effective than demand-enhancing ones. Agricultural policies intersect with cross-scale social-environmental processes to shape smallholders’ adaptive capacities and pathways in sub-Saharan Africa. However, adaptive capacities vary across livelihood groups due to evolving environmental, social, and political-economic processes. Social institutions play key roles in shaping differential adaptation pathways by enabling or constraining opportunities for smallholders.BOOK CHAPTER AUGUST 2026. Sesugh Uker 1,
Menu